Florida Justice Reform Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Meet the President
  • Legislative
    • On the Front Line
    • On The Front Line 2025
    • Achievements
    • 2025 Legislation
  • Appellate Work
  • FJRI in the News
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Member
    • The Committee for Florida Justice Reform
    • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Florida Justice Reform Institute

PIP Again Draws Testimony, Not Votes

December 7, 2011/in News Service of Florida

 

News Service Florida

 

PIP AGAIN DRAWS TESTIMONY, NOT VOTES

By MICHAEL PELTIER

THE CAPITAL, TALLAHASSEE, December 7, 2011……A plan to make changes to personal injury protection insurance inched forward Wednesday as committees in both the House and Senate took testimony but no votes on bills backers say are needed to lower costs in a fraud-riddled system.

The Senate Banking and Insurance Committee and the House Subcommittee on Insurance and Banking both heard from affected parties in the fight over the no-fault coverage set up in the 1970s to pay medical claims for injured motorists.

Most of the testimony in both committees centered around attorneys’ fees and licensing of medical clinics that derive a substantial percentage of their business from PIP claims.

Backers want to cap attorney fees they say now encourage litigation in a system originally set up to avoid legal action.

“There must be some rational relationship between the amount in controversy and the amount of attorney fees awarded,” said William Large, president of the Florida Justice Reform Institute, which favors capping attorneys fees. Large pointed to cases in which attorneys fees dwarfed relatively small payouts.

Plaintiffs’ attorneys, however, argued the insurance companies have ample opportunity to avoid going to court. Further, they said the relationship between claims paid and attorney fees was largely irrelevant because insurance companies will take on a particular court battle instead of settling for a small amount to set precedent for thousands of additional claims.

“To an insurer, it’s not about fighting over a $100 bill,” said Mark Cornelius, an Orlando attorney who handles PIP cases. “It is about the million other cases that have similar charges.”

Physicians groups urged lawmakers to avoid requiring tougher licensing recommendations for physician-run clinics that handle a high percentage of PIP claims. Doctors already face hefty licensure requirements and lawmakers should focus their attention on fraudulent activities.

“To have physicians have to go and be licensed again is expensive and burdensome,” said Jeff Scott, general counsel for the Florida Medical Association.

The Senate bill is expected to be sponsored by Sen. Joe Negron, R-Stuart. The Senate committee concluded its public workshop on the matter, but chairman Sen. Garrett Richter, R-Naples, said that discussion and debate will continue after a bill is filed. The House measure is HB 119.

-END-

12/7/11

See Full Article

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2011-12-07 15:58:362024-12-11 18:05:04PIP Again Draws Testimony, Not Votes
Search Search

FJRI News Categories

FJRI News Archive

Florida Justice Reform Institute

Florida Justice Reform Institute

  • Phone

    (850) 222-0170

  • Hours of Operation

    Monday – Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

  • Address

    210 S Monroe Street
    Tallahassee, FL 32301

Site Links

  • The Committee for Florida Justice Reform
  • About
  • Legislative
  • Appellate Work
  • FJRI in the News
  • Get Involved
© 2025 Florida Justice Reform Institute, All Rights Reserved. | Website Hosting & Web Development by RAD TECH
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
Link to: Canady, Polston – Frequent Dissenters in SCOFLA Cases Link to: Canady, Polston – Frequent Dissenters in SCOFLA Cases Canady, Polston – Frequent Dissenters in SCOFLA CasesFlorida Justice Reform Institute Link to: Crashworthiness Passed in 2011; PIP to be Considered in 2012 Link to: Crashworthiness Passed in 2011; PIP to be Considered in 2012 Florida Justice Reform InstituteCrashworthiness Passed in 2011; PIP to be Considered in 2012
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top