Florida Justice Reform Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Meet the President
  • Legislative
    • On the Front Line
    • On The Front Line 2025
    • Achievements
    • 2025 Legislation
  • Appellate Work
  • FJRI in the News
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Member
    • The Committee for Florida Justice Reform
    • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Florida Justice Reform Institute

Appeals Court Reverses Controversial Ant Bite Case

May 13, 2018/in Florida Record

 

Florida Record

Appeals court reverses controversial ant bite case

By Justin Stoltzfus | May 13, 2018

?The infamous $5 million Florida ant bite verdict has been overturned.

Fire ant

TALLAHASSEE – The infamous $5 million Florida ant bite verdict has been overturned.

A ruling handed down by the First District Court of Appeal reversed the large judgment won by Charles A. Lieupo, a tow truck driver who responded to a tractor-trailer crash involving Simon Trucking. Lieupo for six months said he suffered leg injuries due to fire ant bites, but in a lawsuit filed against the trucking company, he alleged he came into contact with battery acid.

The appellant court did not address the cause of Lieupo’s injuries, only that he was not entitled to file a personal injury lawsuit against the trucking company because his health issues were covered by worker’s compensation insurance.

William Large with the Florida Justice Reform Institute filed an amicus brief in the case, meaning “friend of the court.”

“I’m surprised it ever got this far,” Large told the Florida Record. “This case should have been disposed of by a motion for summary judgment in favor of Simons Trucking.”

Large pointed out that the case seems to hinge on administrative violations, which he said should not be a basis for liability verdicts.

“Administrative violations should form the basis of a fine,” Large said. “They should not be the foundation of a multimillion dollar liability verdict. Hopefully, the first District Court of Appeal has put an end to this.”

The text of FJRI’s amicus brief contends that section 376.313(3) of Florida law does not authorize a strict liability cause of action for personal injury damages.

The brief explains reasons for curtailing personal injury awards relevant to Lieupo’s specific case.

Has the ruling in the $5 million ant bite case put some of these types of legal questions to bed?

“I hope so,” Large said.

https://flarecord.com/stories/511415427-appeals-court-reverses-controversial-ant-bite-case

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2018-05-13 15:56:102024-11-25 22:48:48Appeals Court Reverses Controversial Ant Bite Case
Search Search

FJRI News Categories

FJRI News Archive

Florida Justice Reform Institute

Florida Justice Reform Institute

  • Phone

    (850) 222-0170

  • Hours of Operation

    Monday – Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

  • Address

    210 S Monroe Street
    Tallahassee, FL 32301

Site Links

  • The Committee for Florida Justice Reform
  • About
  • Legislative
  • Appellate Work
  • FJRI in the News
  • Get Involved
© 2025 Florida Justice Reform Institute, All Rights Reserved. | Website Hosting & Web Development by RAD TECH
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
Link to: First District Court of Appeal Overturns ‘Five Million Dollar Ant Bite Case’ Link to: First District Court of Appeal Overturns ‘Five Million Dollar Ant Bite Case’ First District Court of Appeal Overturns ‘Five Million Dollar Ant Bite...Florida Justice Reform Institute Link to: Climate Change: A Plea For Legislation, Not Litigation Link to: Climate Change: A Plea For Legislation, Not Litigation Florida Justice Reform InstituteClimate Change: A Plea For Legislation, Not Litigation
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top