Florida Justice Reform Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Meet the President
  • Legislative
    • On The Front Line
    • Achievements
    • 2026 Legislation
  • Appellate Work
  • FJRI in the News
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Member
    • The Committee for Florida Justice Reform
    • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Florida Justice Reform Institute

Fight Against Insurance Claims Abuses Takes Aim at Attorneys Fees

February 17, 2017/in Sun Sentinel

 

Fight against insurance claims abuses takes aim at attorneys fees

                     A Fort Lauderdale homeowner inspects damage from flooding. Increasing water damage claims are the focus of new bills
            filed before the Florida Legislature meets beginning March 7, 2017. (Susan Stocker / Sun Sentinel)

By Ron Hurtibise
Sun Sentinel – February 17, 2017

Plaintiffs attorneys hired by contractors working under an “Assignment of Benefits” would be barred from collecting so-called one-way attorneys fees if the state Legislature enacts a bill filed Friday.

The bill, crafted with input from state Insurance Commissioner David Altmaier and state-run Citizens Property Insurance Corp., aims to quell rising losses that the property insurance industry warns will spur premium increases for the foreseeable future.

Officials of Citizens, private insurers and their allies have been warning for several years about skyrocketing claims costs driven primarily by a dozen or so South Florida law firms and a small number of repair contractors.

Reform proponents say the law firms teach repair contractors, including roofing companies, auto glass repair shops and water damage restoration companies, how to talk homeowners into signing over the benefits of their insurance policies, so they can “stand in the insured’s shoes” to bill the insurers.

The contractors inflate their work invoices, and then the attorneys quickly file lawsuits if the insurance companies offer to pay less than the full invoices. If the insurers later agree to settle the cases by paying more than their original offers, attorneys are entitled under the one-way attorney fee law to collect thousands of dollars in legal fees from the insurers.

“Our focus is to prevent the rapid increase in [homeowner insurance] rates that we’ve seen over the past year or 18 months,” Altmaier said in an interview Friday. “This legislation is surgical enough to address abuses while allowing folks who are doing things the right way to continue to do it the right way.”

The bill would not prevent attorneys hired directly by homeowners from collecting fees in lawsuits brought against insurers. That’s the original intent of the one-way attorney’s fee law, said Michael Carlson, executive director of the Personal Insurance Federation of Florida.

“The insured is absolutely protected with no limitation to sue their insurance company and get their lawyer paid under the one-way fee statute,” Carlson said.

The law, in place since 1893, is intended to enable policyholders to sue insurance companies without the threat of having to pay the insurance company’s legal fees if they don’t win. But if they do win, the insurance company has to pay the customer’s legal fees.

Citizens and other insurers say the law has been misused by contractors working under assignments, and the attorneys representing them, by filing hundreds of lawsuits without risk of being liable for insurers’ attorneys fees.

Without that protection from risk, critics say, attorneys wouldn’t have the same incentive to file so many lawsuits.

Legislative bills aiming to curb assignment of benefits-related insurance losses over the past four years have died in stalemates between lawmakers loyal to insurers and trial attorneys.

This year’s bill is likely to meet stiff opposition from plaintiffs attorneys as well. 

Lee Jacobson, spokesman for the Florida Justice Association, which represents trial attorneys, called the bill “the insurance industry’s wish list,” adding it “tips the playing field against homeowners in favor of insurance companies.”

Trial attorneys dispute insurers’ positions that claims under assignments are abusive, contending instead that insurers too often delay, deny and underpay claims. They say contractors are best suited to determine the necessary scope of repairs and to deal directly with insurers for payment.

“Under this legislation, homeowners in desperate need of emergency repairs would have to either provide large amounts of cash up front, or face having liens placed on their property [by contractors],” Jacobson wrote. “That is because contractors making emergency home repairs will no longer agree to deal directly with the homeowners’ insurance company for payment.”

Recent court rulings have affirmed third parties’ rights to collect one-way attorneys fees under assignments.

A report released last week by the Florida Justice Reform Institute said litigation against insurers has increased 280 percent since 2000 while Florida’s population has only increased 26 percent. The institute urged the Legislature to return the one-way attorney fee statute to its original intent as a tool exclusively for policyholders.

Barry Gilway, president and CEO of Citizens, has been warning for nearly a year that Assignment of Benefits-driven cost increases would force the company to raise home insurance premiums by the 10 percent maximum allowed by state law indefinitely.

Average Citizens premiums in the tricounty region increased from about $2,900 in 2016 to $3,200 in 2017 and will exceed $4,000 in just three years if action isn’t taken, he said.

Ninety-six percent of water-damage claims originate in the tricounty region, and 45 percent of water claims resulted in litigation in 2016 — up from less than 15 percent in 2011.

Because most losses occur in South Florida, policyholders in the region must cover those losses with higher premiums. 

The share of each South Florida policyholder’s premium paid out for non-weather-related water claims has increased from $637 in 2010 to $1,882 in 2017, according to Citizens.

In an email Friday, Citizens spokesman Michael Peltier said the bill would “provide meaningful benefit to consumers” and called Assignment of Benefits reform “Citizens’ number-one priority for the coming session”

Other policyholder protections in the bill include:

* Contractors would be required to notify insurance companies of an assignment within three days after it is signed by a policyholder.

* Contactors working under an assignment would be barred from suing homeowners or placing liens on their homes if they fail to collect their full invoices from insurance companies.

* Policyholders would have seven business days to rescind the assignment without any penalty or cancellation fee.

* An assignment would have to include a written, itemized work estimate.

* Contractors would be required to submit records upon request and submit to examinations under oath.

The Senate bill was sponsored by Dorothy Hukill, R-Ormond Beach and co-introduced by Kathleen Passidomo, R-Naples.

A House version will be sponsored by James Grant, R-Tampa and co-sponsored by Rene Plasencia, R-Titusville, Altmaier said.
Other bills related to the Assignment of Benefits issue are likely to be filed this year, Altmaier said.

All face a long road to enactment. Among their first stops will be the Senate Banking & Insurance Committee and its new chairwoman, Anitere Flores, R-Miami, who said in January that she plans to look critically at any proposals backed by the insurance industry and to ask for data to back up claims that a crisis exists.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/fl-bz-pressure-grows-for-insurance-reform-20170217-story.html

https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2017-02-17 15:56:552024-11-26 01:46:54Fight Against Insurance Claims Abuses Takes Aim at Attorneys Fees
Florida Justice Reform Institute

Lawmaker Seeks to Revamp Florida’s Medical Malpractice System

March 24, 2014/in Sun Sentinel

 

SunSentinel

Lawmaker seeks to revamp Florida’s medical malpractice system

March 23, 2014 | By Tonya Alanez, Sun Sentinel

TALLAHASSEE — Within days of the Florida Supreme Court eradicating medical-malpractice damage limits, a Central Florida Republican laid out his vision for turning the entire system on its ear.

Trial costs would be eliminated, and so would accusations of negligence or medical malpractice. Cases would be resolved within six to nine months. More patients would get their claims heard. And doctors wouldn’t be driven to order unnecessary tests to protect themselves from liability.

“This is a big, different idea … It is significant, groundbreaking and some have even suggested, radical,” Rep. Jason Brodeur, R-Sanford, told the House Judiciary Committee. “It will save billions for Florida taxpayers and millions for businesses and create thousands of jobs.”

Brodeur’s plan, partially modeled after workers’ compensation, would put claims before a panel of doctors who would determine if “avoidable medical harm” had occurred, and compensation would follow a formulated schedule. Reduced litigation costs would lead to reduced insurance costs, he says.

Opponents – and there are many — say claims would snowball, taking insurance rates with them, physicians would flee the Sunshine state and the state’s high court would deem the measure unconstitutional.

Some critics say the notion will never fly. Medical malpractice is so contentious that even minor tweaks are difficult at best, much less an entire revamp of the system, they say.

“Inevitably what you’re going to have is an explosion of claims,” said Jeff Scott, general counsel for the Florida Medical Association. “I don’t think there is any question that this is a dangerous system.”

The concept puts doctors – and their insurers – on the hook for medical error, defined more expansively than negligence, and makes them liable for avoidable bad outcomes whether they did anything wrong or not, Scott said.

The judiciary committee heard the proposal (HB 739) in workshop Monday. It did not vote.

Joining the Florida Medical Association in opposition were the Florida Chamber of Commerce, the Florida Insurance Council, the Florida Justice Reform Institute and the Florida Justice Association.

Brodeur’s bill is backed by a group called Patients for Fair Compensation, a Georgia-based non-profit that has introduced similar legislation in that state.

The group’s executive director, Wayne Oliver, is former vice president of Center for Health Transformation, a healthcare think tank once owned by Newt Gingrich.

Testifying on behalf of Brodeur’s proposal was Joanna Shepherd-Bailey of Emory University law school. She calculated that in a decade’s time it could save Florida employers as much as $66 billion in health-insurance costs. With those savings, they could hire more workers, she said.

But a consultant specializing in medical liability refuted Brodeur’s analysis and cost estimates.

 “The stated intent is mathematically impossible,” said Susan Forray, of Milliman, an international actuarial firm.

She estimated the proposed legislation could cause claims to increase by as much as 500 percent and current medical liability costs of $600 million a year could increase by between $340 million and $1.9 billion.

Rep. Cary Pigman, a doctor and Avon Park Republican, testified in support of his fellow House member’s idea: “Most doctors would leap at the opportunity to get out of the current confrontational, adversarial system.”

But William Large, president of the Florida Justice Reform Institute, warned the Florida Supreme Court would surely overturn the measure and “all your work will be for naught.”

Three days before the House panel heard Brodeur’s proposal, the Florida Supreme Court on March 14 ruled that a hard-fought 2003 state law limiting pain and suffering damages in medical-malpractice lawsuits was unconstitutional.

By limiting non-economic damages to $500,000 for doctors and $1 million for hospitals and clinics, insurance rates for doctors had leveled off and even started to decline in recent years, according to medical associations.

But Brodeur urged his fellow lawmakers not to retreat from the idea out of fear of the high court.

“Wholesale reform is what needs to happen, we need to quit nibbling at the edges, which is what we’ve been doing for the last 12 years,” he said. “Let’s admit that the system is violently broken.”

[email protected], 954-356-4542954-356-4542 or Twitter @talanez

See Full Article

https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2014-03-24 15:55:552024-12-11 17:56:33Lawmaker Seeks to Revamp Florida’s Medical Malpractice System
Page 2 of 212

FJRI News Categories

FJRI News Archive

Search Search
Florida Justice Reform Institute

Florida Justice Reform Institute

  • Phone

    (850) 222-0170

  • Hours of Operation

    Monday – Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

  • Location Location
    Address

    215 South Monroe Street
    Suite 140
    Tallahassee, FL 32301

Site Links

  • The Committee for Florida Justice Reform
  • About
  • Legislative
  • Appellate Work
  • FJRI in the News
  • Get Involved
© 2026 Florida Justice Reform Institute, All Rights Reserved. | Website Hosting & Web Development by RAD TECH
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top