Florida Justice Reform Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Meet the President
  • Legislative
    • On the Front Line
    • On The Front Line 2025
    • Achievements
    • 2025 Legislation
  • Appellate Work
  • FJRI in the News
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Member
    • The Committee for Florida Justice Reform
    • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Florida Justice Reform Institute

Report: Auto glass AOBs aren’t slowing down

November 12, 2019/in Florida Politics

Fla Pol

Windshield Glass

2019 is on track to have as many auto glass lawsuits as last year

By Drew Wilson on November 12, 2019

Suing over car window and windshield repair fees is a booming business, according to a new report from the Florida Justice Reform Institute.

FJRI’s Auto Glass AOB Data Update, released Tuesday, shows 2019 is on track to have as many auto glass lawsuits as last year. But FJRI said the number could be much higher, as their report only tracks auto glass AOB lawsuits filed by companies with “glass” or “windshield” in their names.

“Our updated report shows how persistent AOB lawsuits based on the one-way attorney fee continue to drive up overall litigation and costs for policyholders,” FJRI President William Large said.

AOB, short for assignment of benefits, is a legal process that allows policyholders can sign over their insurance benefits to a third-party in exchange for a quick repair.

Those on the other end of the AOB agreement often sue insurance companies to collect fees. Insurers say those lawsuits are often for inflated claims. When coupled with the one-way attorney fees statute requiring insurance companies pay the cost of litigation if they lose, premiums are increasing.

“Although the benefits of the one-way attorney fee statute were clearly intended for premium-paying policyholders, corporate assignees continue to cash in on its common law extension,” FJRI counsel and Capital City Consulting lobbyist Ashley Kalifeh said.

Lawmakers passed an AOB reform package last year, but it only applied to home repairs. Auto glass AOBs were carved out in the closing days of the 2019 Legislative Session.

The auto glass language was removed after complaints from independent auto-glass repair shops, which said they were being shortchanged by insurers and were forced to sue in order to get fair pay for their work.

Still, FJRI’s report shows nearly all auto glass lawsuits come from just 15 law firms — one firm, Malik Law, accounts for nearly 30 percent of all such lawsuits filed this year.

Additionally, the vast majority of auto glass lawsuits are in Hillsborough and Orange counties. FJRI speculates that’s due to higher attorney fee awards in those counties.

“Last year the legislature acted boldly to address rampant AOB lawsuits in the context of property insurance claims.” Large said. “Now, the legislature should continue their good work and pass AOB lawsuit reform for auto glass claims.”

https://floridapolitics.com/archives/310935-report-auto-glass-aobs-arent-slowing-down

https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2019-11-12 15:58:572025-07-10 15:15:40Report: Auto glass AOBs aren’t slowing down
Florida Justice Reform Institute

Linda Stewart seeks to reduce windshield glass repair incentives

November 12, 2019/in Florida Politics

 

Fla Pol

Windshield Glass

Linda Stewart seeks to reduce windshield glass repair incentives
No more cash, rebates or gift cards.

By Renzo Downey on November 12, 2019

On the heels of a report showing that the influx of windshield glass repair lawsuits is here to stay, Senators heard a bill Tuesday to reduce incentives for filing suits and increase consumer protections.

Orlando Democratic Sen. Linda Stewart’s bill (SB 312) would prevent auto repair shops from offering incentives including cash, rebates or gift cards for customers to sign over their auto insurance benefits for faster repairs.

Current incentives intended to help small businesses compete with national glass-repair brands have created an industry perpetuated by a dozen law firms, largely in Stewart’s home of Orange County. Local repair shops offer cheaper, expedited repairs when given the right to charge the customer’s insurance company at a rate that is often higher than through the company’s contracted vendor.

“It does hurt the insurance companies, I will say, because they’re having to pay more than they normally would pay, but they’re allowed to do that,” Stewart said. “This bill does not take away in any way shape or form their ability for a lawsuit. That’s not in the bill.”

After an amendment entered Friday, the bill would require repair shops to submit cost estimates and to notify insurance companies about pending suits, an effort to have law firms and insurance companies negotiate out of court. The fine print on the waiver relinquishing customer’s insurance coverage would also be enlarged to a readable 16-point font.

“It’s unfair to not tell the people that they’re giving away all their rights to this company. Then they find it interesting that, when they go into a lawsuit, their name is on a lawsuit because they gave away their assignment of benefit (AOB),” Stewart said.

Auto glass lawsuits peaked in 2017 at nearly 24,000, according to the Florida Justice Reform Institute report. The tort reform lobbyists estimate the number of suits to reach 16,000 or 17,000 by the end of the year, still four times the 2013 level of more than 4,000.

In the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee, lawmakers agreed to postpone further testimony on the bill until next week to allow more witnesses to testify on the bill. Stewart expects the committee to pass the bill, but the committee’s ranking Democrat, Tampa Sen. Darryl Rouson, said he does not support the expanded bill.

Last Session, lawmakers stripped the reform from the AOB omnibus bill but left reforms in for property repairs.

More than 90% of auto glass suits come from a dozen firms mostly clustered in Orange and Hillsborough counties.

Lobbyists and lawyers appeared at the committee meeting to testify against the bill, but more are expected to testify next week, which Stewart said might derail the legislation.

Florida Justice Association President Leslie Kroeger testified that the bill would benefit insurance companies that don’t need to submit the documentation small businesses would need to complete the repair.

“Practically speaking, the larger companies, which are looking frankly to hold a monopoly in this area, have a negotiated payment. They don’t need an assignment of benefits,” Kroeger said. “So what this really is doing is a death by a thousand cuts to small businesses, to independent mom-and-pop auto replacement [businesses].”

The bill also requires auto shops to recalibrate advanced driver-assistance systems — modern safety features like automatic braking sensors are often installed directly into windshields — if necessary, or to notify customers that the system will need to be restored. Current law does not require shops to do so, which can leave customers unwittingly without an operating ADAS.

https://floridapolitics.com/archives/310984-linda-stewart-seeks-to-reduce-windshield-glass-repair-incentives

https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2019-11-12 15:58:162024-11-25 10:15:58Linda Stewart seeks to reduce windshield glass repair incentives
Florida Justice Reform Institute

Legislature approves upping county lawsuit threshold

May 3, 2019/in Florida Politics

 

Fla Pol

Court room

Legislature approves upping county lawsuit threshold
The bill would raise the maximum damages handled in county court cases to $30,000 on Jan. 1

By Drew Wilson on May 3, 2019

The House and Senate voted unanimously Friday to for a bill that could see more lawsuits handled in county courts.

Since 1992 there has been a $15,000 limit on damages in civil suits, also called “small claims,” filed on the county level.

Lawsuits above that threshold are handled in circuit courts.

HB 337 would raise the maximum damages handled in county court cases to $30,000 on Jan. 1, 2020, and to $50,000 by Jan. 1, 2022. The $15,000 limit would remain in place for cases filed before Dec. 31, 2019.

Lawmakers have cited the current caseloads in circuit courts as the reason for the change.

“We have an overburdened circuit court at this point,” Sen. Gayle Harrell, a Stuart Republican, said last month.

The Florida Supreme Court has recommended the threshold be increased to $25,000. The Florida Justice Reform Institute noted the high court found the increase to $50,000 to be of most concern.

With Friday’s votes, the bill heads to Gov. Ron DeSantis.

https://floridapolitics.com/archives/295584-legislature-approves-upping-county-lawsuit-threshold

https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2019-05-03 15:58:162024-11-25 20:21:25Legislature approves upping county lawsuit threshold
Florida Justice Reform Institute

More civil lawsuits could be headed to county courts

April 16, 2019/in CQ Roll Call, Daily Commerical, Florida Politics

Fla Pol

Hammer

More civil lawsuits could be headed to county courts

This bill moves to the full Appropriations Committee Thursday.

By A.G. Gancarski on April 16, 2019

On Tuesday, the Senate Criminal and Civil Justice Appropriations Subcommittee moved a bill that would shunt more civil lawsuits to county courts.

The bill (SB 328) will move to the full Appropriations Committee on Thursday.

At present, there is a $15,000 limit on damages in civil suits, also called “small claims,” filed on the county level. This bill, as amended in committee, would raise that to $30,000 on Jan. 1, 2020, and to $50,000 by Jan. 1, 2022.

The current cap hasn’t been changed since 1992.

Bill sponsor Jeff Brandes, a Republican from St. Petersburg who chairs the subcommittee, noted the bill “gradually raises” those amounts, in accordance with inflation.

“This is a very important issue,” Brandes said. “The county courts are really designed to be the people’s courts.”

“More of these cases get thrown into circuit courts,” he continued.

The Florida Justice Reform Institute noted that the Supreme Court wanted a lower threshold initially, and found the increase to $50,000 to be of most concern.

“They’ve recommended an increase from 15 to 25,” said its President, William Large.

Large expects bigger case loads for circuit judges because of the legislation, with circuit courts bearing the burden of appeals from the county courts.

He argued that appeals should be heard by district courts of appeal, which handle cases coming out of circuit courts.

“I want everything to go to the DCA,” he said.

But Sen. Darryl Rouson, a St. Petersburg Democrat, said he supports the bill because “it’s time to do something different.”

“I believe the Legislature will seek the support of the Florida Supreme Court,” Rouson added.

“We have an overburdened circuit court at this point,” added Sen. Gayle Harrell, a Stuart Republican.

Sen. Annette Taddeo, a Miami Democrat, likewise spoke in support.

In his closing statement, Brandes allowed that there may be further tweaks regarding the appellate process, and that he’s willing to refine the language with Supreme Court staff.

And, he said, “this is an ongoing conversation with our partners in the House.”

___

The News Service of Florida contributed to this post.

http://floridapolitics.com/archives/293797-civil-lawsuits-in-county-courts

https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2019-04-16 15:58:222025-07-13 14:11:29More civil lawsuits could be headed to county courts
Florida Justice Reform Institute

AOB lawsuits outpacing population growth

March 27, 2019/in CQ Roll Call, Daily Commerical, Florida Politics, Roundtable Politics

 

Fla Pol

Insurance Agents AOB Reform

AOB lawsuits outpacing population growth

Florida is growing fast. AOB lawsuits are growing faster.

By Drew Wilson on March 27, 2019

Florida is growing fast.

The state is already the third-largest in the union and recent research from the Florida Chamber of Commerce estimates 1,100 people move to the Sunshine State every day — that’s amounts to 5 million new residents by 2030.

But another statewide metric is accelerating faster: assignment of benefits lawsuits.

“While Florida is a growth state, AOB lawsuits are growing much faster than population, going from little more than a few hundredths of a point as a fraction of Florida’s population to nearly a full three-quarters of a percent now,” said Capital City Consulting lobbyist and FJRI counsel Ashley Kalifeh.

AOB is a process where policyholders sign over their insurance benefits for a quick repair after their property — be it a home, car windshield or something else — is damaged.

The contractor or attorney who receives those benefits often attempts to collect a payout from insurers in court. AOB reform advocates say those lawsuits lead to inflated payouts which in turn drive the cost of insurance premiums for all Floridians.

According to the Florida Justice Reform Institute, AOB lawsuits made up more than half of all lawsuits filed in Florida in 2018 — the eighth year in a row they’ve held the majority.

Additionally, the quantity seen 18 percent growth year-over-year.

A report produced by Kalifeh shows AOB suits increased by over 900 percent between 2008 and 2018. Total lawsuits increased by a little over 400 percent during the same stretch.

“Unfortunately, rampant AOB lawsuits threaten our confidence in the state’s legal climate,” said FJRI President William Large. “The legislature can help the people of Florida by standing up to the trial lawyers and passing meaningful AOB lawsuit reform.”

“This updated report details how out-of-control AOB lawsuits based on the one-way attorney fee continues to accelerate, driving up overall litigation and costs for policyholders.”

The report also found that about 85 percent of those suits were filed by nine law firms. Just one attorney — Gregory Gudin of Landau & Associates — filed more than 30,000 AOB lawsuits last year.

Most of those suits were filed in a handful of counties, too. Miami-Dade and Broward accounted for nearly half of property AOB suits, while Hillsborough County alone was home to more than 50 percent of auto glass AOB suits.

FJRI supports measures moving through the House and Senate that would make changes to AOB rules.

Among those reforms is an end to one-way attorney’s fees in AOB cases. Currently, the losing side of an AOB case has to cover the attorney’s fees for the prevailing party.

Opponents of the reforms say AOB suits would slow down if insurance companies green lit repairs faster and used higher quality contractors, especially in the case of water damage.

http://floridapolitics.com/archives/291981-aob-lawsuits-outpacing-population-growth

https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2019-03-27 15:56:102024-11-25 20:36:24AOB lawsuits outpacing population growth
Florida Justice Reform Institute

Senate panel hears of ‘stupefying’ increase in insurance litigation

February 4, 2019/in Florida Politics

 

Florida Politics

Sen Boxson

Senate panel hears of ‘stupefying’ increase in insurance litigation

“No other state has experience a phenomenon remotely like this.”

By Michael Moline on February 4, 2019

Florida isn’t the only state that allows assignment of benefits, or AOB agreements, involving insurance policies.

It is the only state, however, that allows the one-way attorney fee, requiring insurers to cover policyholders’ legal costs in litigation over claims since 2013.

That, an actuary with a National Insurance group says, explains a near doubling of AOB-related lawsuits against carriers in Florida.

“No other state has experienced a phenomenon remotely like this,” James Lynch of the Insurance Information Institute told members of the Senate Banking & Insurance Committee.

He also cited a Florida Justice Reform Institute study that found a more than 100-fold increase in AOB litigation since 2000.

”This is a stupefying increase,” Lynch said.

“I can comfortably say that no other state has experienced a phenomenon remotely like this — either in insurance or anything else,” he said.

That argument was the most compelling to date on whether Florida should reform AOBs and the one-way attorney fee statute, which was intended to even the odds for policyholders taking on deep-pocketed insurance companies, said committee chairman Doug Broxson, a Pensacola Republican.

“We have a dynamic that started in early 2000 with one claim, and now we have 175,000 claims,” he said. “What happened?”

Broxson has introduced legislation (SB 122) restricting one-way attorney fees to named insured and beneficiaries — and not to contractors who proffer AOBs to policyholders in exchange for quick repairs. Critics — including insurance companies, business interests, and conservative organizations, that blame the fee system for escalating litigation and premium increases.

Representatives of such organizations repeated their arguments during Monday’s hearing. Contractors were present, but weren’t able to make their points fully as the meeting ran up against its 6 p.m. adjournment.

Broxson promised they would get their chance when the committee reconvenes in two weeks. But he plans a vote on his bill at that time.

”We’re trying to get all the arguments on the table and let everybody have a fair chance of dealing with this issue,” Broxson said.

http://floridapolitics.com/archives/287419-senate-panel-stupefying-increase

https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2019-02-04 15:59:152024-11-25 21:31:35Senate panel hears of ‘stupefying’ increase in insurance litigation
Florida Justice Reform Institute

Robert Luck’s Florida Supreme Court appointment garners reaction

January 14, 2019/in Florida Politics

Florida Politics

Judge Luck

Ron DeSantis is naming Robert J. Luck of the
Third District Court of Appeal
as his second
appointment the Florida Supreme Court.

(Image via J. Albert Diaz)

Robert Luck’s Florida Supreme Court appointment garners reaction
By Staff Reports on January 14, 2019

Leaders in law, politics and business chimed in after news that Gov. Ron DeSantis had appointed appellate judge Robert Luck to fill a vacancy on the state’s Supreme Court:

— Republican Attorney General Ashley Moody: “Judge Luck has distinguished himself in his service as a federal prosecutor, circuit court judge, and a judge on the Third District Court of Appeal. He will be a great addition to the Florida Supreme Court.

“As a former judge and prosecutor, it is important that we have well-qualified justices who are committed to the rule of law. Personally, I am excited about Justice Luck’s appointment. We served as circuit judges at the same time and we taught judges together constitutional principles and fundamental rights against unlawful governmental intrusions.

“I know he will be a vigilant guardian of freedom and separation of powers. My office looks forward to appearing in front of the full Florida Supreme Court, including Justice Luck.”

— Senate President Bill Galvano, a Bradenton Republican: “I was pleased to read that Justice Luck commented during the announcement of his appointment that the Constitution, not the Judiciary, is supreme. I certainly agree.

“Governor DeSantis has demonstrated again today that he is committed to appointing judges who have the utmost respect for the separation of powers defined in our Constitution. I wish Justice Luck well as he begins his service on our state’s highest court.”

— U.S. Sen. and former Gov. Rick Scott, a Naples Republican, in a tweet: “Another strong choice from @GovRonDeSantis! Congratulations to Robert Luck on his appointment to the Florida Supreme Court. I was proud to appoint him to the District Court in 2017 and I know he will always uphold the Constitution and the rule of law.”

— House Speaker Jose Oliva, a Miami Lakes Republican: “… a welcome development for all who believe in judicial restraint. Justice Luck’s vocal repudiation of judicial activism and opposition to legislating from the bench is both a refreshing and reassuring judicial philosophy.

“With each nomination the Governor is solidifying Florida’s place amongst those who cherish freedom and the rule of law. I congratulate Justice Luck and his family and welcome another Miami native to the Florida Supreme Court.”

— Sen. Perry Thurston Jr., a Fort Lauderdale Democrat: “With his last appointment to Florida’s Supreme Court imminent, we are again urging Governor Ron DeSantis to maintain diversity on our highest court. We know there are candidates not being considered that are highly qualified and represent Florida’s diversity.”

 — Florida Family Policy Council President John Stemberger: “Robert Luck is a brilliant jurist. To speak with, or listen to Judge Luck, is to realize you are in the presence of a truly unique and Scalia-like intellect.

“Luck fully understands that the role of a judge is a limited one of restraint. He has demonstrated over the years through his written decisions and public statements, that the job of a judge is to interpret law as it is written and not make law or engage in result-oriented decision making.

As an observant Jew, Luck is also grounded in ethical and moral principles that will surely guide and inform his service to the state of Florida. Once again, Ron DeSantis has made a very solid appointment that will help to define his legacy as Governor for years to come.”

— William Large, president of the Florida Justice Reform Institute: “Governor DeSantis’ appointment of Justice Luck … continues an impressive record of accomplishment in only the first few days of his administration. DeSantis’ actions are the mark of a leader determined to exert the executive’s constitutionally lawful check on the judicial branch of government.

“Justice Luck’s broad experience and legal acumen will serve the Court well. The Florida Justice Reform Institute applauds Governor DeSantis’ for his continued commitment to setting a new course for our Florida Supreme Court.”

— Fred Karlinsky, Greenberg Traurig shareholder and member of the Florida Supreme Court Judicial Nominating Commission: “Governor DeSantis made another excellent and very thoughtful Supreme Court selection. Robert Luck has a good record on the bench and a reputation as someone who is going to uphold the law. Like newly appointed Justice Lagoa, he has been dedicated to public service.”

http://floridapolitics.com/archives/285408-robert-luck-supreme-court-reaction

https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2019-01-14 15:59:092025-07-13 15:40:49Robert Luck’s Florida Supreme Court appointment garners reaction
Florida Justice Reform Institute

Newsmakers react to Barbara Lagoa’s Florida Supreme Court appointment

January 9, 2019/in Florida Politics

Florida Politics

Lagoa

HEADLINES
Newsmakers react to Barbara Lagoa’s Florida Supreme Court appointment

By Staff Reports on January 9, 2019

With Gov. Ron DeSantis on Wednesday appointing appellate judge Barbara Lagoa to fill a vacancy on the state’s Supreme Court, leaders in law, politics and business reacted:

— Attorney General Ashley Moody: “As the first Cuban-American woman to serve on the 3rd District Court of Appeals and the author of more than 300 majority opinions, her elevation is well deserved.

“As a former judge and prosecutor, I know the importance of having well qualified justices who are committed to the rule of law on Florida’s high court. Like Gov. DeSantis, I believe judges should enforce the law as written and intended by our elected lawmakers.

“… Gov. DeSantis has fulfilled one of his most important campaign promises, and he should be applauded for doing so, quickly and purposefully. My office looks forward to appearing in front of the full Florida Supreme Court, including newly selected Justice Lagoa.”

— Lt. Gov. Jeanette Nuñez: “I am excited that the Governor has appointed such an extraordinarily well qualified candidate to the Florida Supreme Court. Justice Barbara Lagoa embodies the work ethic and values of the South Florida community. She will be an outstanding jurist who will uphold our constitution and the rule of law.”

 — Senate President Bill Galvano, a Bradenton Republican: “I appreciated the Governor’s comments during his inauguration yesterday in which he stressed the proper role of the judiciary, and I am confident today’s appointment of Justice Lagoa is in line with the standards the Governor laid out during his remarks.

“I share the Governor’s concern that in recent years the power of the judicial branch has extended beyond its limited constitutional responsibility, in many cases eroding the authority of the legislative branch. I believe democracy is at its best when each branch of government exercises both authority and restraint at the appropriate time.

“That concept was certainly at the heart of the many of the comments we heard from the Governor yesterday and echoed again this morning with the appointment of Justice Lagoa. I offer my congratulations to Justice Lagoa and wish her well as she begins this exciting new role serving our state on the Florida Supreme Court. I also congratulate Governor DeSantis on his first Supreme Court appointment.”

— House Speaker Jose Oliva, a Miami Lakes Republican: “Justice Barbara Lagoa is eminently qualified to serve the state of Florida on the Supreme Court. Whether it was graduating from Columbia Law School, serving as an Assistant U.S. Attorney, or as a judge on the 3rd District Court of Appeal, (her) commitment to this country and our Constitution should serve as an example for all Floridians.

“Today, one of Hialeah’s own sits on the Florida Supreme Court. And freedom is more secure because of it.”

 — Maria D. Garcia, President-Elect of the Cuban American Bar Association (CABA): “For the past 12 years, Judge Lagoa has served our community and judiciary as the first Cuban-American woman on the 3rd District Court of Appeal. CABA is very proud of all her accomplishments and her new role in the Florida Supreme Court.

“… As a fellow daughter of Cuban exiles, I am excited that Governor DeSantis made such a wise choice for the Florida Supreme Court. Judge Lagoa has always set a bright example for the legal community and has an impeccable record as a jurist.”

— Florida Family Policy Council President John Stemberger: DeSantis “has made a simply outstanding choice … She is smart, thoughtful, and has a conservative judicial philosophy that appreciates the limited role of the court.

“She is also deeply committed to her faith, her family and her community. In the world of judicial appointments, Barbara Lagoa is a home run. Governor DeSantis should be highly commended for a very thorough vetting process and a commitment to appoint such highly principled Justices as Barbara Lagoa.”

— William Large, president of the Florida Justice Reform Institute, called Lagoa’s appointment “the first step towards fulfilling his promise to appoint judges who will interpret the law and not legislate from the bench.”

His organization, which advocates for tort reform, has “long called for judges who are textualists – who will say what the law is, and not what they think it should be – and who show deference to the legislature as the rightful policymaking branch of government.”

— Tallahassee lawyer Daniel Nordby, who was general counsel to former Gov. Rick Scott, added it was “a home run for Gov. DeSantis. She’s a brilliant and principled judge with a proven track record on the appellate bench. Promise kept.”

http://floridapolitics.com/archives/284997-react-barbara-lagoa-appointment

https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2019-01-09 15:58:282025-07-14 15:31:08Newsmakers react to Barbara Lagoa’s Florida Supreme Court appointment
Florida Justice Reform Institute

Tort reform group slams Florida for ‘excessive’ litigation

October 22, 2018/in Florida Politics

Florida Politics

Tort reform group slams Florida for ‘excessive’ litigation

STAFF REPORTS
October 22, 2018

Florida loses more than $11.8 billion and 126,000 jobs each year to “excessive” litigation, according to an analysis released Monday by the Florida Justice Reform Institute.

The trend most hurts the retail sector, at a cost of more than 39,413 jobs, followed by business services, at 20,237, and health services, at 17,452, according to research conducted for Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse, another tort reform organization.

The analysis claims more than $7.5 billion in lost personal income, including wages, interest and rents — more than $357 for every person in Florida.

Additionally, such litigation trims almost $615 million from annual state revenues and $516 million for local government.

“These findings detail how Florida’s lawsuit abuse climate is holding back our economy and costing every person real money,” institute president William Large said in a statement.

“The Florida Justice Reform Institute’s entire mission is focused on fighting wasteful civil litigation. Now, this landmark report reveals just how much work we have to do in Florida.”

The Perryman Group, an economic forecasting firm, drew on surveys, industry information, and other sources to produce the report.

Tort lawsuits seek redress for wrongdoing that cause loss or harm, and include actions for personal injury and products liability. Tort reforms have included legislated limits on damages and mandatory arbitration of workplace and business disputes.

http://floridapolitics.com/archives/278422-tort-reform-excessive-litigation

https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2018-10-22 15:59:342025-07-13 18:56:32Tort reform group slams Florida for ‘excessive’ litigation
Florida Justice Reform Institute

No-fault insurer prevails in attempted class action over Medicare reimbursement

September 26, 2018/in Capitol News Service, CQ Roll Call, Daily Commerical, FlaNewsOnline, Florida Politics, Florida Trend, Florida Watchdog, Orlando Political Observer, Roundtable Politics, Tallahasssee Reports, wctv.tv

Florida Politics

No-fault insurer prevails in attempted class action over Medicare reimbursement

Michael Moline – September 26, 2018

A state appeals court has rejected a class action filed by a Medicare Advantage organization seeking double reimbursements for its costs of providing care that should have been covered by a no-fault auto insurer.

In a unanimous ruling, the 3rd District Court of Appeal said such organizations would have to establish each claim separately against Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance.

The court overruled Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Samantha Ruiz-Cohen, who had certified a class potentially including 37 Florida Medicare Advantage organizations, or MROs.

The lead plaintiff was an entity called MSPA, an assignee of the defunct MRO Florida Healthcare Plus Inc.

“Proof that certain medical bills paid by MSPA’s alleged assignor should have been paid by Ocean Harbor as a primary payer will not establish that other medical bills paid by a different MAO should also have been paid by Ocean Harbor as a primary payer,” Judge Thomas Logue wrote.

“To the contrary, proof to establish liability will necessarily devolve into a series of mini-trials under Florida no-fault law … which precludes a finding of predominance and renders this case inappropriate for class action treatment,” Logue wrote.

“Accordingly, we reverse the provisions of the certification order under review in conflict with this opinion.”

MAOs are private companies that contract with Medicare to provide coverage at a flat rate per enrollee. They profit to the degree they provide the required coverage for less than the flat rate.

The coverage is meant to be secondary to other, primary, coverage, including personal injury protection policies.

Miami plaintiffs’ attorney John Ruiz argued that he could establish the common claims necessary to sustain a class action using an algorithm that analyzes police reports of accidents and other records that Ocean Harbor must report under state and federal law.

He argued that Ocean Harbor’s obligation to pay was automatic once his client established that it had made payments reimbursable by the insurer.

The 3rd DCA disagreed.

“We reject the notion that MSPA claims reimbursement rights are not governed by Florida law relating to the recovery of benefits under a PIP policy, and are therefore automatic,” Logue wrote.

“Instead, MSPA must demonstrate that, in addition to any requirements of federal law, Ocean Harbor was required to make the payment in the first instance under Florida no-fault law for each reimbursement it claims.”

William Large, president of the tort-reformer Florida Justice Reform Institute, praised the outcome.

“The plaintiff has filed dozens of copycat cases against Florida insurers raising the same claims — this case was simply the first to reach the class certification stage,” Large said in a written statement.

“In certifying the class, the trial court failed to rigorously apply Florida’s class action certification requirements, which are necessary to protect defendants’ due process rights. The 3rd DCA recognized this overreach and ruled appropriately.”

http://floridapolitics.com/archives/275876-no-fault-insurer-prevails-in-attempted-class-action-over-medicare-reimbursement 

https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/fjri-news.jpg 800 800 RAD Tech https://www.fljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Florida-Justice-Reform-Institute.jpg RAD Tech2018-09-26 15:58:282025-07-13 19:04:59No-fault insurer prevails in attempted class action over Medicare reimbursement
Page 9 of 11«‹7891011›»
Search Search

FJRI News Categories

FJRI News Archive

Florida Justice Reform Institute

Florida Justice Reform Institute

  • Phone

    (850) 222-0170

  • Hours of Operation

    Monday – Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

  • Location Location
    Address

    215 South Monroe Street
    Suite 140
    Tallahassee, FL 32301

Site Links

  • The Committee for Florida Justice Reform
  • About
  • Legislative
  • Appellate Work
  • FJRI in the News
  • Get Involved
© 2025 Florida Justice Reform Institute, All Rights Reserved. | Website Hosting & Web Development by RAD TECH
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top